Quick revision ↓ Medical Dictionary
Deep Learning — Module 01
Connect symptoms and examination findings to a differential, targeted investigations, initial priorities and reassessment.
First encounter
Introduce yourself and your role, confirm identity, obtain consent and establish the main concern in the patient’s own words. Check whether urgent assessment is needed before taking a long history. Explore onset, course, associated symptoms, function and the patient’s ideas, concerns and expectations. Respect privacy, use a suitable interpreter when needed and identify the source of information when the patient cannot provide a complete account.
History and context
Presenting symptoms make sense alongside previous illness, operations, medicines, allergies, family history and social circumstances. Record prescribed, over-the-counter and traditional products and what actually happens after a reported allergy. Tobacco, occupational exposure, travel, diet and access to care can change the differential. Ask sensitive questions respectfully and explain their relevance. A problem list should include functional and social needs as well as named diseases.
Examination and synthesis
Measure observations and assess general appearance before a focused systems examination, expanding when findings suggest another system. Explain intimate examinations, offer an appropriate chaperone and preserve dignity. A normal finding may reduce a probability without excluding disease. Summarize the case using key discriminating features rather than repeating every detail: for example, acute exertional breathlessness with hypoxemia and unilateral leg swelling directs attention to a different risk pattern than years of stable wheeze.
Differential and tests
Rank diagnoses by likelihood and the harm of missing them. Choose tests that address a clinical question and interpret results using pretest probability, test limitations and timing. An incidental abnormality may not explain the symptoms. Avoid anchoring on the first label or closing the differential after a single positive result. Reconsider when the course, examination or response to treatment does not fit the working diagnosis.
Plan and communication
Explain the working diagnosis, uncertainty, next steps and what would require urgent reassessment. Shared decisions consider benefits, burdens and patient preferences. Document important positive and negative findings, reasoning and responsibility for pending results. A concise handover states the situation, relevant background, assessment and recommended action. Students should work within competence, seek supervision and never represent an unperformed examination as normal.
High-Yield Revision
- Assess urgency before completing a long history.
- A differential includes dangerous alternatives as well as likely causes.
- Every investigation should answer a clinical question.
Common Exam & Concept Pitfalls
- Do not interpret a positive test without clinical context.
- Do not document an examination that was not performed.
Sources & Further Reading
Curriculum and reference review: 24 September 2026. These original notes teach clinical reasoning and recognition, not standalone prescribing or procedure protocols. International guidance supports the principles below; local pathways, resources and authorized supervision govern patient care. Faculty review is pending.
- PM&DC MBBS Curriculum 2024 — Medicine & Allied overview (printed page 20) and General Medicine section (from page 74)
- Acute assessment: Resuscitation Council UK: ABCDE · NICE adult sepsis recognition · Anaphylaxis guidance
- Cardiology: NICE acute coronary syndromes · Heart failure · Atrial fibrillation
- Respiratory: GINA 2026 asthma summary guide
- Gastrointestinal and renal care: NICE upper gastrointestinal bleeding · Acute kidney injury
- Endocrinology: 2024 multi-society hyperglycemic crises consensus · NICE thyroid disease
- Neurology: NICE stroke and TIA · Bacterial meningitis
- Allied care: NICE neutropenic sepsis · Rheumatoid arthritis · Self-harm assessment
- Continuity and safety: NICE delirium · Multimorbidity · WHO Medication Without Harm · WHO patient safety solutions
